Home > RECENT, SOCIAL MEDIA > Social Media: So Easy a Caveman Can Do It?

Social Media: So Easy a Caveman Can Do It?

August 9th, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments

cavemanI mean really. Is it all that hard? Create a Facebook page, invite your 200 closest friends from pre-school, connect it to your Twitter feed, and voila! Instant social network. Climb on board one of the Twitter followbots to scrape up another 12,000 warm bodies and you’ve got rockstar influence, right? Time to turn your sights onto the beckoning world of affiliate programs and start rolling around in the $96,543 per week you’re supposed to be making. Or better yet! Find a job in social media. (It’s an actual industry, right?)

Yes! Social media! So easy a caveman can do it!

And boy can they. It appears they’ve even managed to get jobs working for large companies and trusted organizations. They’re really doing well for themselves!

In fact, this weekend I thought I was watching a Geico commercial but turns out I was witnessing the pre-historic fail whale of a Facebook app from the American Cancer Society. It’s kind of sad because ACS is a great organization. And one little social media mishap is doing some embarrassing damage.

Not to disparage the organization, but just because someone knows how to start a Facebook group and shows a little creative spunk doesn’t qualify them to handle social media for a national organization with significant brand value. Someone in the back office coming up with crafty ideas, can with the click of a mouse, take a 96 year-old organization and alienate its most loyal supporters.

Yeah. Social media is that powerful.

So what started the whole brouhaha? Over the weekend I noticed a Facebook status from a friend who’s a cancer survivor:

ACSfacebook1

Hey, I thought it was a nice post. My friend, Rebecca (@rebeccaesparza) is big-time into cancer support groups, runs the pink races, relays, walks, all that. Good stuff. So it wasn’t a surprise to see that she was supporting American Cancer Society on her birthday, right? Um, wrong. When checking my Facebook feed the next day, it was a bit of a different story:

ACSfacebook2

Apparently she didn’t realize that in joining the ACS birthday group she gave permission to update her status. (Anyone else getting that icky, slimy feeling?) Even Rebecca, who’s such a dedicated supporter had to admit she felt used.

Good cause. Bad use of social media.

Still think a caveman should be doing it?

Some days it seems like there’s a whole contingent of social media “directors” operating off of not much more than Mafia Wars and a Bebo account. Days like today. When the American Cancer Society is using members’ Facebook statuses to solicit donations. And taking some pretty hefty liberties by telling friends “don’t give her a birthday gift, donate to us instead!”

I’m trying to picture the Neanderthal moment when that idea came up. I’m still not clear if there were opposable thumbs involved.

With all due respect to a great organization, that one little oversight compromises a lot of brand goodwill and integrity built up by ACS over nearly a century. The organization makes a tangible difference for a lot of people. There should have been more care and attention given to what was going on in the social media department.

And this is true for every company and organization.

Social media is fast becoming the central hub for brand communication. It’s easily the greatest opportunity we’ve ever had for building brands. Or for tearing them down. I can’t think of anyone who’d hand over Ferrari keys to a caveman. But there are plenty of companies giving away control to employees who haven’t accumulated enough marketing perspective. Remember the Pizza Hut exec who so proudly announced the company’s new face of social media was going to be a Summer intern? Don’t be that guy.

Seasoned marketers and executives everywhere need to take responsibility for the development of social media and carefully guide and mentor those who want to be a part of it. Encouraging employees to participate and learn about social media is a good thing. But hiring them into social media management or high-profile consumer-facing positions and letting them execute ideas unsupervised is not.

I’m all for mentoring the next generation and I love the cycle of progress that comes from it. But I’m cringing as I watch the social media leapfrog where basic social media knowledge qualifies someone to direct a social media program. Companies do need to integrate social media. Just not backwards. The enthusiastic tech-savvy employee with the Twitter account should be executing tactics developed by a marketing pro. Not the tech-savvy employee having total autonomy over online brand voice because the marketing pro hasn’t figured out social media yet.

Or (yikes!) thinks it’s not worth their time.

Social media is powerful. It’s a marketing discipline that requires an emphasis on strategic planning. And a clear understanding of what a brand is, what its purpose is, and how to build it with integrity. So when you come across something like the American Cancer Society’s Facebook application that hijacks the status (and birthday gifts) of supporters, it’s pretty obvious we’ve got some social media cavemen running around that need to be reigned in.

Should we be clamoring for a mass extinction of the caveman? Not at all. Social media is the future of branding. It’s good for everyone to get familiar and comfortable with it. To learn it and engage in it. Yes, let the caveman be a part of the social media program. Teach them marketing, mentor them on branding, give them your Vesper Martini recipe. Help them understand what’s at stake every time they press “enter.”

The caveman may start off dragging knuckles at first, but as anyone who’s seen the Geico commercials can attest, a caveman has the potential to learn quite a lot. Eventually he’ll be wearing Kenneth Cole and listening to Thom Yorke.

And hopefully someday engaging in social media. In a full upright position.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Luke Grange
    Walter thank you for pointing this out as I picked up on it also as I read through what is a great Post. Michelle you have put a lot of thought into it the positioning of Social Media in an organisation. In addition to being a marketing discipline its also a powerful knowledge disseminator and a proactive way to draw attention to educational sessions and events.
  • Thanks for the write-up of the case, it's another important milestone in the evolution of thinking about social media and how to plan for it.

    I'm struggling with this comment: "Social media is powerful. It’s a marketing discipline that requires an emphasis on strategic planning."

    Most people commenting seemed to agree.

    Social media is about the customer experience, and the brand behavior, but surely this is much bigger than being a "marketing discipline"? You know what I mean about all the other parts of the organisation being involved.

    I appreciate that in the textbook sense "marketing" is supposed to be holistic and nurturing the brand across all touch points etc. But the 99% reality is that it has degenerated to "branding" and sending out "positioning" "messages" through "channels".

    I don't think that it is a recipe for success to bring that mindset into planning for social media - am I wrong?

    I'm also pondering if this means that "branding" as a whole is dead, as it would seem to imply sending out these messages - one way. I see you support and use the word "branding" and I'm interested to know how it fits with social media. In short I thought social media would spell the end of "branding".

    I'm not saying the end of "brand", nor the end of being responsible for brand, nor even the end of advertising. I'm just thinking that brand has become a whole lot more than marketing/branding as it is practiced today.

    Walter Adamson @g2m
    Social Media Academy, Australia
  • Thanks for the post, Mike! Chris Brogan made a great point, and yes... the comments bring clarity and depth to his post. My favorite is the concept of "while mastering a skill, there is also usually a mastering of making it look easy." I'm paraphrasing, but the thought is a powerful one.
  • Here is a related blog post that says it very simply. "Not Rocket Science". The best content are some of the comments to this blog.

    http://www.chrisbrogan.com/not-rocket-science/?ds...

    Michael Palmer, Life Coach
  • Michelle - how right you are. I continue to be amazed that companies will turn over their communication voice to someone who knows the social media, but has no real marketing experience. Your comment that social media is "... easily the greatest opportunity we’ve ever had for building brands. Or for tearing them down" is spot on.

    I do think this creates an opportunity for us seasoned marketing executives that understand social media to lead the successful path.

    Social Steve
    www.socialsteve.wordpress.com
  • Thanks for the comment, Bryna. I really appreciate that you enjoyed it and found truths in it. You make a great point: We're all new to social media but the non-cavemen are those determined to do it the right way. It definitely sounds like you've got the thirst for knowledge and sense of brand respect that social media needs more of. Congratulations on being included in the Top 30 Under 30! I'll check out the list!
  • I think this is probably the best post on social media I've read all month (and believe me, I've waded through hundreds). As a Communications Specialist at a small marketing firm, even I have to remind myself of the care that needs to be taken with my personal social media accounts (let alone our corporate ones). In an age where everyone's watching...well, everyone's really watching. Unfortunately that means there will be casualties. What's really disturbing is that anyone can call themselves a 'social media expert' and no one bats an eye.

    Regardless, I commend you on a post so unique in comment and insight. As an aside, for all those looking for some quality Tweeters to follow, @LenKendall complied a list of the Top 30 Under 30 Tweeters (just posted today). I post it not just because I'm on the list (although I'm excited to be included), but because these are people who are trying to not be the caveman--and succeeding. http://bit.ly/2qLuBR
  • I agree, Mike! Tamsen posted that thought as well. Her perspective was that it's possible a high-pressure fundraising culture could lead a seasoned marketer to make a decision that compromises the brand in favor of funding. Like you, I've also seen seasoned marketers make decisions that don't reflect their experience.

    And to further clarify, the social media caveman can be any age with any level of experience. These days, there's a wide range of people practicing social media, from college age to 60's and beyond. Because the format is so new, anyone can be making a mistake. The caveman reference in the post, although maybe it's not fully clear, applies both to the "enthusiastic tech savvy," as well as to the seasoned marketers who are either making bad decisions because of directive pressure or because they don't fully understand how social media affects brand equity. Or too busy to care... or haven't fully fleshed out an idea from all angles. Or who knows what!

    The point is, there's a lot at stake. Social media may be new, but it's powerful. With this new level of market sensitivity, brands can't afford social media mistakes, whether they come from someone new to the marketing industry or from a seasoned pro.

    Thanks for your input, Mike!
  • How do you know that this was the work of "the enthusiastic tech-savvy employee with the Twitter account" and not a marketing pro with a bad idea? Social media is new enough that even marketing pros might screw up. I've worked with many of them.
  • Just fantastic!

    About 6 months ago, I launched a portion of my recruiting firm to focus on social media for this very issue. Picking up technologically capable talent is very different from finding someone who can a) live the brand, b) executive on the brand and c) stay on top of the tools... we all know that they change fast!

    Thanks for this great contribution! Hopefully it will push some companies to reconsider their approach and evaluate this skill class differently in the future.

    I'm looking forward to what you have to share! I'm sure it's going to continue to be great!

    Thanks Michelle!

    Looking forward,
    Michael
  • Tamsen, you're right! I love how you've brought to light the reason why it's possible a seasoned marketer could have come up with the birthday hijack app: a culture of compromising relationships for dollars and paying lip service to the cause and the people when the money is the true priority. I know a lot of people who appreciate the work of the American Cancer Society. Let's hope the Facebook application was an overzealous accident and not a strategic intention.

    Thanks for the comments on the blog! I've missed tweeting with you the last few months while I've been working on it! Happy to see you here :)
  • I'd say there's another point for which I fault ACS more: creating a dollars-at-any-cost fundraising culture that allowed (if not encouraged) the app to be created in the first place. I could argue that, in a different culture, even a caveman wouldn't have been so, well, Neanderthal in approach.

    The larger issue is the classic organizational behavior challenge of "rewarding for A, while hoping for B." In fundraising offices, metrics relate almost exclusively to dollars raised, while lip service (but not promotions, recognition, etc.) is paid to "building relationships."

    With that as the backdrop, it's easy to see how even an experienced person could have created that app, or how whomever approved the idea didn't see (or didn't care about) the ramifications.

    [The new blog is spectacular, by the way--congrats!]
  • Michelle, this is a great cautionary tale.

    What you describe is ANTI-social media. There's something sociopathic about deciding it's OK to hijack someone's identity to solicit money from that person's friends.

    Social media is an open microphone attached to a massive PA system. Companies need to be very careful about who they let speak for them.




    The
  • Thanks for the comment, Wayne! And thanks for sharing your experience about the executive looking for an entry-level person for social media. I think a lot of the confusion company leaders have over social media is that young people are familiar with the technology and social media is seen as a frivolous pasttime by people who don't understand it yet, so a lot of executives assume they just need to find someone young and cheap to do it. The American Cancer Society mishap is a great example of what happens when someone without the proper background executes social media.
  • Nice post, Michelle.

    A CMO was telling me about the entry level person they were trying to find to run their social media program. When I asked when are sending that person to represent the company at [their huge international trade show], they looked at me like they got a whiff of bad cheese.

    Explaining that the person who represents the company in social media represents the company to an international audience appears to be out of reach for many executives... and some, fortunately, not.
  • I totally agree with you guys! It's so refreshing to see others who also take social media seriously. It's such a higher level activity than a lot of companies are viewing it. I think a lot of it is that the marketing executives and C-levels are just too busy to address it, so it falls into the laps of employees who don't have the right foundation for implementing it properly. It's easy to sign up for Twitter, start a Facebook group, create online promotions, or write a company blog. But it's not easy to manage and build a brand. And that's the ultimate purpose of social media.
  • Nice blog Michelle, and a nice post too. The introduction of social media is going through the same stages now as the introduction of the web. It is initially being driven by the people with the knowledge to implement it, often without the help of people who fully understand the rules of engagement. That's why any new media initiative should always include team members who understand and consider the end users, based on their knowledge of similar interactions across other media. In other words: Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.
  • Great post, Michelle.

    Many companies have finally understood that they have to engage in social media, and that is a good thing. The bad news here is that these companies do not understand that social media is a lot more than just a communication channel you can use without chief supervision.

    That is where professional social media consultants (like you) come in and have to lead companies in their first steps in the wonderful, but (for many people) unknown world of social media.

    Thanks for sharing this story with us.
  • Haha! Christine, yeah, that photo is pretty wild! I have a new featured post coming soon so it'll be relegated to another page. I was cracking up earlier when I posted to a friend's Facebook page with the blog link and it picked up that photo. I was thinking "Geez, I wish that caveman was at least a little prettier!" Thanks for reading and thanks for the comment!
  • Christine Hall
    Great story. Hideous photo. All I could do to keep reading until I got down far enough until the photo was gone. Please take that nasty thing down.
blog comments powered by Disqus