<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TEDWomen: Brilliant or Belittling?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/</link>
	<description>The BrandForward Blog℠ provides a fresh look at trends in marketing and advertising, technology and social media, with a focus on how social media and emerging technologies are moving the industry forward and changing the way brands connect with the consumer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Great White People Book Club &#171; expat+HAREM, the global niche</title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14650</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White People Book Club &#171; expat+HAREM, the global niche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14650</guid>
		<description>[...] wondering if a gathering separate from the main TED event to discuss the impact of womankind is brilliant or belittling. A blog sought a more nuanced perspective and tried the group replacement test, substituting one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wondering if a gathering separate from the main TED event to discuss the impact of womankind is brilliant or belittling. A blog sought a more nuanced perspective and tried the group replacement test, substituting one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sf</title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14643</link>
		<dc:creator>Sf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14643</guid>
		<description>I can understand the issues you raise and agree with many of your points of view, however I also still enjoy female only environments on occasions, as I am sure men enjoy male only environments. Watching Mad Men makes me see how far culture has travelled, but I am completely open to both inclusion AND separation rather than either / or - men have just got their first radio hour on radio 5 in UK, men have got magazines that appeal to them and so have women, so have children and older people, different nationalities enjoy different styles and tones - sometimes it&#039;s great to be together sometimes it&#039;s great to be apart. I am happy that TED are experimenting to ensure they can include as many people in as many ways as possible. If female identity is a dimension they want to test then that&#039;s fine with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the issues you raise and agree with many of your points of view, however I also still enjoy female only environments on occasions, as I am sure men enjoy male only environments. Watching Mad Men makes me see how far culture has travelled, but I am completely open to both inclusion AND separation rather than either / or &#8211; men have just got their first radio hour on radio 5 in UK, men have got magazines that appeal to them and so have women, so have children and older people, different nationalities enjoy different styles and tones &#8211; sometimes it&#39;s great to be together sometimes it&#39;s great to be apart. I am happy that TED are experimenting to ensure they can include as many people in as many ways as possible. If female identity is a dimension they want to test then that&#39;s fine with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Followup on the TEDWomen Conversation</title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14642</link>
		<dc:creator>Followup on the TEDWomen Conversation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14642</guid>
		<description>[...] views. It means a lot to me and to HuffPo readers to have you join the conversation here in and elsewhere online. The larger opportunity is for TED as an organization and for TED’s larger community to continue a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] views. It means a lot to me and to HuffPo readers to have you join the conversation here in and elsewhere online. The larger opportunity is for TED as an organization and for TED’s larger community to continue a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasia</title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14641</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14641</guid>
		<description>I was at TEDGlobal2009 and this month too, when they announced this new conference, and immediately went online to see the reaction at their Facebook page. 85 negative comments. I had my own questions about this new event and whether TEDGlobal could be showcasing more women who weren&#039;t singing, dancing or reciting poetry on-stage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also wonder if it&#039;s true that they can&#039;t find women to speak. They are not the only conference which claims this. I both hope this is true for their sake, and hope it is not true -- because if it is true, we have a serious problem with qualified women speakers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One odd thing I heard at TEDGlobal this year: speaker Laurie Santos, a cognitive researcher, was asked why none of the lab assistants in her slides were women. Didn&#039;t she have women students and assistants? Yes, she said she did. But they didn&#039;t want to be photographed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at TEDGlobal2009 and this month too, when they announced this new conference, and immediately went online to see the reaction at their Facebook page. 85 negative comments. I had my own questions about this new event and whether TEDGlobal could be showcasing more women who weren&#39;t singing, dancing or reciting poetry on-stage.</p>
<p>I also wonder if it&#39;s true that they can&#39;t find women to speak. They are not the only conference which claims this. I both hope this is true for their sake, and hope it is not true &#8212; because if it is true, we have a serious problem with qualified women speakers.</p>
<p>One odd thing I heard at TEDGlobal this year: speaker Laurie Santos, a cognitive researcher, was asked why none of the lab assistants in her slides were women. Didn&#39;t she have women students and assistants? Yes, she said she did. But they didn&#39;t want to be photographed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TED Blog &#124; TEDWomen: Join the conversation</title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14640</link>
		<dc:creator>TED Blog &#124; TEDWomen: Join the conversation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14640</guid>
		<description>[...] has touched off some really vibrant conversations online. Some have embraced the idea; others have reservations. At TED, we&#8217;ve been reading with interest and weighing in on occasion. After reading a number [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has touched off some really vibrant conversations online. Some have embraced the idea; others have reservations. At TED, we&#8217;ve been reading with interest and weighing in on occasion. After reading a number [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonmcrawford</title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14639</link>
		<dc:creator>jonmcrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14639</guid>
		<description>reading my own post, I just realized I&#039;m proving my point here on attendee bias, I referred to TEDWomen as &quot;specifically for women&quot;, when I&#039;m fully aware that it is actually specifically ABOUT women. I think that&#039;s the problem here, the branding creates a picture of the event that may not necessarily be true, and may inadvertently discourage participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reading my own post, I just realized I&#39;m proving my point here on attendee bias, I referred to TEDWomen as &#8220;specifically for women&#8221;, when I&#39;m fully aware that it is actually specifically ABOUT women. I think that&#39;s the problem here, the branding creates a picture of the event that may not necessarily be true, and may inadvertently discourage participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonmcrawford</title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14638</link>
		<dc:creator>jonmcrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14638</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying that it won&#039;t be a worthwhile event, or that I&#039;m judging it to be lacking before it happens. I am simply saying that branding the event as TEDWomen will likely limit the audience that attends, (not that men would not be welcome, but would be less likely to attend a conference specifically for women) when the whole purpose of TED is to take new ideas and reach audiences that would not normally have encountered those ideas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also agree that the website is easy to navigate and find talks, I am not disputing that point. These talks will therefore be accessible to internet users the same as the others. However, we are discussing the physical conference that is scheduled separately as TEDWomen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why not continue to feed the same ideas through the existing pipeline? The audience exposure will be more diverse, and therefore the impact should be greater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not saying that it won&#39;t be a worthwhile event, or that I&#39;m judging it to be lacking before it happens. I am simply saying that branding the event as TEDWomen will likely limit the audience that attends, (not that men would not be welcome, but would be less likely to attend a conference specifically for women) when the whole purpose of TED is to take new ideas and reach audiences that would not normally have encountered those ideas.</p>
<p>I also agree that the website is easy to navigate and find talks, I am not disputing that point. These talks will therefore be accessible to internet users the same as the others. However, we are discussing the physical conference that is scheduled separately as TEDWomen.</p>
<p>Why not continue to feed the same ideas through the existing pipeline? The audience exposure will be more diverse, and therefore the impact should be greater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy </title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14637</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14637</guid>
		<description>Why are you interpreting this as not being with the entire community of TED? Men and women can present and men and women can attend. The reason they are having the event is not to segregate but because they believe that this is a topic steam too big to adequately cover at a TED event. Would you rather they said, instead of TEDWoman we&#039;ll just devote an entire TED to discussing these important issues? I suspect people wouldn&#039;t be happy with that decision. So instead, they&#039;ve said, we think there&#039;s a lot going on here and we can&#039;t adequately address it as part of the TED conference so in order to give it the thought and attention it deserves we&#039;re going to hold a special event to address it. If it doesn&#039;t work, they won&#039;t do it again. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And FYI - there are already a range of TED events that go on apart from the big one and so far, it seems like people are able to follow what they are interested in. I would never look at the huge range of talks on the TED website and say that it&#039;s bad because there is such a diverse range of them. I don&#039;t see why suddenly adding a special event that focuses on women will suddenly make this already huge confluence of talks and topics difficult to follow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I feel bad for the organizers who are trying to do something good - the important word being trying - and everyone is so quick to judge the event&#039;s success before they&#039;ve even had an opportunity to hold one. They already have some pretty amazing speakers lined up. I wish we could take a &#039;wait and see&#039; approach and give them the benefit of the doubt. They seem to have a pretty good idea of what they&#039;re doing - otherwise we wouldn&#039;t all feel so connected to and passionate about the TED brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you interpreting this as not being with the entire community of TED? Men and women can present and men and women can attend. The reason they are having the event is not to segregate but because they believe that this is a topic steam too big to adequately cover at a TED event. Would you rather they said, instead of TEDWoman we&#39;ll just devote an entire TED to discussing these important issues? I suspect people wouldn&#39;t be happy with that decision. So instead, they&#39;ve said, we think there&#39;s a lot going on here and we can&#39;t adequately address it as part of the TED conference so in order to give it the thought and attention it deserves we&#39;re going to hold a special event to address it. If it doesn&#39;t work, they won&#39;t do it again. </p>
<p>And FYI &#8211; there are already a range of TED events that go on apart from the big one and so far, it seems like people are able to follow what they are interested in. I would never look at the huge range of talks on the TED website and say that it&#39;s bad because there is such a diverse range of them. I don&#39;t see why suddenly adding a special event that focuses on women will suddenly make this already huge confluence of talks and topics difficult to follow.</p>
<p>I feel bad for the organizers who are trying to do something good &#8211; the important word being trying &#8211; and everyone is so quick to judge the event&#39;s success before they&#39;ve even had an opportunity to hold one. They already have some pretty amazing speakers lined up. I wish we could take a &#39;wait and see&#39; approach and give them the benefit of the doubt. They seem to have a pretty good idea of what they&#39;re doing &#8211; otherwise we wouldn&#39;t all feel so connected to and passionate about the TED brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonmcrawford</title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14636</link>
		<dc:creator>jonmcrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14636</guid>
		<description>The question I have here is similar to many of the others, but why is TED fragmenting the &quot;ideas worth spreading&quot;? This goes beyond the superfluous TEDWomen (if we need to have more thoughtful discussions, then let&#039;s have them with the ENTIRE community of TED), to other events as well. Focus topics can be beneficial in some instances, but if it becomes too scattered, the benefits of TED (cross-pollination of ideas for inspiration) become diluted. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we need new topics, let&#039;s have more frequent events, not different events, we won&#039;t all be able to follow all of the possible focus topics and still gain the benefits of all the ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question I have here is similar to many of the others, but why is TED fragmenting the &#8220;ideas worth spreading&#8221;? This goes beyond the superfluous TEDWomen (if we need to have more thoughtful discussions, then let&#39;s have them with the ENTIRE community of TED), to other events as well. Focus topics can be beneficial in some instances, but if it becomes too scattered, the benefits of TED (cross-pollination of ideas for inspiration) become diluted. </p>
<p>If we need new topics, let&#39;s have more frequent events, not different events, we won&#39;t all be able to follow all of the possible focus topics and still gain the benefits of all the ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynnHarris</title>
		<link>http://michelletripp.com/index.php/2010/07/21/tedwomen-brilliant-or-belittling/comment-page-2/#comment-14635</link>
		<dc:creator>LynnHarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelletripp.com/?p=2670#comment-14635</guid>
		<description>By the way Michelle, I thought your post was excellent and I&#039;ve posted it on my Unwritten rules-the book facebook page &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/pages/Unwritten-Rules-The-Book/239239586981?ref=ts&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.facebook.com/pages/Unwritten-Rules-T...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way Michelle, I thought your post was excellent and I&#39;ve posted it on my Unwritten rules-the book facebook page <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Unwritten-Rules-The-Book/239239586981?ref=ts" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Unwritten-Rules-T.." rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/pages/Unwritten-Rules-T..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
